AMS or IMS? Peaches or apples?

Last week, Paul Jones explained on VoIP Survivor the basic concepts behind AMS. The name might ring a bell to those familiar with IMS, but there is no real connection (besides the unfortunate use of a similar acronym). While IMS is an ongoing work, AMS is just beginning. There are many people out there engaged today in one way or another with IMS. They come from different companies and participate in various organizations (read more...)

By Tsahi Levent-Levi  |  June 5th, 2008  |  Filed under Standardization
2 comments  |  Add your own 


Interoperability in SIP – state of the Art? – Part II

This is the second part of Interoperability in SIP and its relation to Art. You can read the first part here. SIP Interoperability workshop There were about 20 short but essential presentations at the 90 minutes workshop by the people representing different companies and organizations (yours truly represented IMTC and RADVISION). Overall message was rather unified. It is not all doom and gloom - there is basic interoperability in SIP. But all interoperability is extremely clustered - implementations usually work (read more...)

By Anatoli Levine  |  January 22nd, 2008  |  Filed under Interoperability
2 comments  |  Add your own 


Interoperability in SIP – state of the Art? - Part I

SIP today is a standard-de-facto, “The Protocol” which runs our multimedia communication. I believe nobody would argue with this statement. All the vendors have their SIP based equipment in the field, so considering the level of maturity of the protocol (about 10+ years old) and more than 20 SipIt events -(SIPit IOT events) as well as numerous IOT events by other consortia and standard bodies, we can expect that majority of devices on the market are highly interoperable. (read more...)

By Anatoli Levine  |  January 15th, 2008  |  Filed under Interoperability
1 comment  |  Add your own 



Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe via email:

Join the Survey